What I'm doing: macros generating macros generating structs, and elimination forms those structs. Matching against a list of arbitrary fields is easier than keeping track of the actual fields.
struct->list might be what I want; thanks! -- Sent from my phoneamajig > On Nov 9, 2016, at 19:23, Jack Firth <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not 100% sure what you're attempting, but it looks like you're > duplicating the behavior of `struct->list`. If you wish to pattern-match on a > struct as if it were a list you could use the `app` match expander: > >> (struct posn-3d (x y y)) >> (match (posn-3d 1 2 3) > [(app struct->list (list-rest x other)) > (apply posn-3d x (reverse other))) > (posn-3d 1 3 2) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
