> On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:22 PM, David Storrs <david.sto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The 'thunk' procedure is really useful and is sprinkled liberally through my > code because it saves keystrokes / is clearer than (lambda () ...). I often > find myself writing (lambda (x) ...) for something and wishing that there was > an equivalent of 'thunk' for that.
There's thunk*, which produces a function that accepts any number of arguments; is that what you're looking for? > Is there? If not, what would be a good name for it that I could use to > create a macro for it? My current suggestion is 'thwonk', but I figured I'd > bounce it off other people first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
