Hi, A couple questions regarding literals in syntax-parse:
First, I'm trying to define a syntax-class that is just a set of literals, and I'm wondering if there is a slightly better way that this: * http://pasterack.org/pastes/86722 I'd just prefer to not repeat all the literal definitions. Second, I'm wondering if it'd be possible to implement a #:datum-literal-set option for syntax-classes, as I'd like to also share a list of literals (that are not bound ids) among multiple classes. Thanks, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
