You have a valid argument here, Jos -----Original Message----- From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dmitry Pavlov Sent: jueves, 22 de diciembre de 2016 11:30 To: racket-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [racket-users] Narrow radix of string->number.
On 12/21/2016 11:33 PM, Jos Koot wrote: > > Or up to 60, 60 even nowadays being a commonly used radix in time notation. FWIW, the radix of the time notation does not seem that simple to me. I would rather say it is a combined notation. base-10 (days), base-60 (up to 24 hours+minutes+seconds), base-10 (fractions of a second) or base-60 (up to 360 degrees+minutes+seconds), base-10 (fractions of a second) > Why restricting it to 36? I guess that the original poster implied 10 digits + 26 Latin letters for notation. Best regards, Dmitry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
