On Monday, July 24, 2017 at 11:01:33 PM UTC+2, amz3 wrote: > By the way, do you recommend binding wiredtiger using typed racket? > > [3] they are other solution in racket. > [4] http://hyperdev.fr/projects/wiredtiger/ > > That said, I am not sure it can scale as much as I want/need given racket > thread model [5]. I will experiment. > > [5] http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/eval-model.html#(part._thread-model) > > Anyway, I stumbled upon rscheme persistence [6] and though that it could > change my approach of disk persistence. Also someone on the IRC channel told > me about GemTalk Systems which apparently achieve transparent persistence and > distribution. Are you aware of such work in racket? Can you recommend > something to read regarding the subject? Is pointer swizzling a good start? > > [6] http://www.rscheme.org/rs/a/2005/persistence/ > > > amz3
Since I am not the right person to answer the questions you've asked at the end of your detailed post let me at least help you bumping the thread. I want to give you also words of encouragement for your planned efforts as racket (and my humble self) will definitely benefit from more industry targeted frameworks/tools. Regarding Datomic - isn't it more Datascript (https://github.com/tonsky/datascript) that you are trying to achieve? Whichever way you go, having Datomic/Datascript alternative in the Racket world sounds exciting. Looking forward to reading further updates on your work (frontend & backend)! Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
