Is there a convention on naming library functions? I'm thinking that
`library-function-name` is the right way to export functions, but I
haven't read enough Racket code to know what qualifies. For example, a
"money" library would export functions like "money-convert" and

Does that seem right? What's everyone else in Racket-land doing? What
about other Lisp languages?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
For more options, visit

Reply via email to