On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 10:57:17 AM UTC+3, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I've just tested on Linux and OS X and I don't see that behavior. I'm
> quite confused.

Yes, scratch what I said. The "many-places" benchmark only fails this way for 
me on a particular Linux VM, which just so happened to be the one I was testing 
it on. Maybe I got the VM in a bad state. If the problem is meaningfully 
related to the benchmarked application, I'll follow up on it.

Meanwhile, here are some benchmark results for "many-places". The transferred 
data sizes suggest it worked correctly.

results/custom-many-places.txt:Requests per second:    4931.29 [#/sec] (mean)
results/custom-many.txt:Requests per second:    6449.73 [#/sec] (mean)
results/custom-places.txt:Requests per second:    7325.81 [#/sec] (mean)
results/custom-single.txt:Requests per second:    7793.91 [#/sec] (mean)

I'll try this again with two fixed cores available to the application container.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to