Thank you, I have made my own exception type now. Is `exn:fail:rpc` 
appropriate or should I use a different name? Using that name looks like 
I'm inserting it into Racket's own exception type hierarchy.

On Friday, December 1, 2017 at 8:11:27 PM UTC+1, Ben Greenman wrote:
> ...

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
For more options, visit

Reply via email to