This is great, and looks like it really was what I was looking for! You
seem to have made a ton of progress on all sorts of stuff that would
have honestly taken me ages to get to the equivalent level. ;)
Re: the missing commits and etc, waiting till mid-January is a-ok with
me... maybe what would be a good idea is if in mid-January you're able
to get the latest stuff pushed up there, you could ping me and I could
help test the system? I could also test before then on the current
code, but maybe it's just best for me to wait.
(I'm planning on writing an implementation of the Linked Data Signatures
standard-in-progress in Racket. I've already got a working json-ld
expander and compactor... what I was missing was what seems like exactly
the work you've done here on the crypto library.)
Thanks for all your work on this!
- Christopher Lemmer Webber
Ryan Culpepper writes:
> I have a crypto library in progress that I haven't released yet. The
> repo is at https://github.com/rmculpepper/crypto, but the repo is
> missing a lot of local commits and I won't be able to fix it until
> If you want to try out the old version, you'll also need asn1-lib from
> rmculpepper/asn1 at commit a32ee72.
> On 12/31/17 10:33 AM, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> So I've been making a lot of progress in porting my tooling over to
>> Racket, and it's been a blast. Horray! However, I do a lot of work on
>> stuff that involves using quite a bit of cryptography, and it doesn't
>> seem that there's a general purpose cryptography library available for
>> Racket. Am I right in that? Particularly, I need to use asymmetric
>> (public key) cryptography tooling for encryption/signatures and also
>> HMAC signatures.
>> I'm guessing I probably need to write one. My thoughts are that I
>> should probably use the Racket FFI library and use openssl (maybe
>> gnutls?) but I'm not really sure. I haven't touched the FFI yet...
>> However, it does look like Racket already ships with some of the right
>> bits. racket/collects/openssl/ contains a swath of relevant openssl
>> tooling, just apparently not all the bits for general public key
>> cryptography and etc.
>> I'm happy to dive into hacking... the purpose of this email is mostly to
>> check if work has already been done here other than what I found above
>> and what I should coordinate with :)
>> - Christopher Lemmer Webber
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.