Brilliant.  Thanks, Matthew.

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Matthew Flatt <> wrote:

> At Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:08:39 -0500, David Storrs wrote:
> > I've got some tests that are crashing due to running out of memory.  I
> > would rather not pull aside to track down the issue, preferring instead
> to
> > get the functionality working now and solve the memory problem later.
> > Regardless, Racket is only getting 128MB, which seems pretty anemic.
> >
> > I've checked 'racket --help' and googled but apparently my google fu is
> > weak.  How do I tell Racket that it's okay to take more RAM?
> 128MB sounds like DrRacket's limit. Select "Limit Memory..." in the
> "Racket" menu.
> Otherwise, Racket will use as much memory as the OS allows. So, if I
> guess wrong about DrRacket, I think you must have a limit at the OS
> level and need to use something like `ulimit` or `limit` in your shell.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
For more options, visit

Reply via email to