Thanks a lot for your insights. I'll look into (module+test ...). Progedit looks great as well, it'd streamline a large part of my program. I need to get familiar with Scribble and write proper documentation, but my time is very limited. As soon as I got a free weekend I'll give Scribble a better look. I wasn't aware there was another way to use provide, thanks again for explaining.
Have a great day, Dex -----Original Message----- From: Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:25 PM To: Dexter Lagan <dexterla...@gmail.com>; us...@racket-lang.org Subject: Re: [racket-users] Provide form generator Thank you for contributing. A few suggestions: * You probably want to put your unit tests, and the `(require rackunit)`, inside `(module+ test ...)` forms. That makes it better as a library or program, and also is what Racket expects for testing. * You can make this a full-fledged Racket package, with an `info.rkt` and Scribble documentation, and listing it on "http://pkgs.racket-lang.org/". See: https://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/index.html * You can make your program automatically add&update the `provide` form in user's files, and perhaps `progedit` is helpful for that: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/progedit/ * There seem to be two schools of thought on where `provide` belongs: (1) one big form near the top/bottom of the file or module, like an interface summary; and (2) locating the `provided`-ness information of a symbol at the definition site, such as through a `provide` form right next to the `define` form, or with syntax that combines `provide` and `define`. So, while you're using a tool you developed for #1, remember that #2 is something you might also want to try sometime. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.