I just barely put up Goblins on the package repo this week.  I haven't
actually tested loading it on another machine, so I'm (literally) not
sure what issues there are. :)

The maintainer (me) is active, but it's pre-alpha.

Arie van Wingerden writes:

> Thx. Jens!
>
> Both packages appear to have some issues.
> Are their maintainers still active?
>
> /Arie
>
> 2018-05-10 12:54 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard <jensa...@soegaard.net>:
>
>> The Package Index has two suggestions: goblins and syndicate.
>> Haven't tried any of them.
>>
>> https://pkgd.racket-lang.org/pkgn/search?q=actors+
>>
>> /Jens Axel
>>
>>
>> 2018-05-10 12:45 GMT+02:00 Arie van Wingerden <xapw...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> having a shortlist of favorite programming languages:
>>> - Lisp like
>>> - actor based
>>> Racket appeals to me most, because of all it's nice features, e.g. built
>>> in GUI and concurrency options.
>>>
>>> So, I was wondering if there is a library for using actors in Racket.
>>>
>>> I searched the web, but didn't find anything obvious.
>>>
>>> Please keep in mind that I once happened to be a pro (systems)
>>> programmer, but that these days I just program as a hobby :-)
>>>
>>> TIA
>>> /Arie
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Racket Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Jens Axel Søgaard
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to