At 2018-05-16T13:49:52-04:00, John Clements wrote: > It seems like make-parser should probably be provide’d. I’ve pushed a > change to make ssax:make-parser a top-level provide.
Thank you very much. In fact, it may be a good idea to restore (provide (all-from-out "ssax/ssax.rkt")) > Would you (N. Raghavendra) be interested in taking the raw > pseudo-documentation currently provided for ssax:make-parser and > reformatting it into something useful, perhaps with an example? Would > you (N. Raghavendra) be interested in taking the raw > pseudo-documentation currently provided for ssax:make-parser and > reformatting it into something useful, perhaps with an example? I'll draft something, and submit a PR to jbclements/sxml on GitHub. Raghu. -- N. Raghavendra <ra...@hri.res.in>, http://www.retrotexts.net/ Harish-Chandra Research Institute, http://www.hri.res.in/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
