On 1/23/2019 12:02 PM, Brian Adkins wrote:
It looks like you're still using an arbitrary wait time to assume the logging event queue is empty. I like it much better than my sleep idea, but it seems like there is still the problem of choosing between 1) using a timeout value to short and missing a log message, or 2) using a timeout value too long and wasting time waiting.


I am relying on all posts to the queue having been made *before* the stop event is sent.  I am NOT relying on wait time - there just has to be some timeout specified so the sync call returns when the queue is empty.

George

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to