Oh nice, I didn't know we could do that one! Point taken :) I suppose (hope?) you can still use sandboxing with memory limits for this?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:52 AM Alex Harsanyi <alexharsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:36:40 PM UTC+8, Laurent Orseau wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:25 AM Alex Harsanyi <alexha...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> although I am not sure it is a good idea to call read on strings received >>> from the user... >>> >> >> They're not eval'ed, >> >> > Try: (call-with-input-string "#100000000000000[]" read) > > Alex. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
