Previously on this program... https://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/2013-May/thread.html [racket-dev] else clauses: possible change to match?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:59 PM Greg Hendershott <greghendersh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep, I also spent a non-zero number of years not even realizing "else" > wasn't a magic literal for match. And then remembering to use _ > instead, as Sorawee suggested. > > > I think this shows why it's usually better for syntax to use > #:keywords instead of literals? If cond and case used #:else, this > wouldn't be a problem. > > (Racket inherited those from Scheme. But we don't have to follow that > example in our own, new macros.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
