At Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:50:40 -0800, Jack Firth wrote: > Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no `break-evt`? The > existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that it is possible to have > mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing on an event or raising a > break. And we have an analogous construct for `sync/timeout` in the form of > `alarm-evt`. Is there something about breaks that makes this idea > impossible?
I haven't tied to implement it, but I don't immediately see any obstacle to `break-evt` as an event constructor (that takes a thread argument, perhaps defaulting to `(current-thread)`). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
