Thanks for working on this, but Racket's `thread` construct is not parallel (in the sense that you will not see more than one CPU active on your machine at a time with code that uses `thread`).
Check out places and futures for alternatives that do support parallelism. Robby On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:52 AM Dexter Santucci <dexterla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I made concurrent (multi-threaded) versions of map, andmap and > for-each for Racket: > > https://github.com/DexterLagan/pmap > > Because I'm a little slow and lazy, I haven't checked packages for a > proper version. > > If this isn't too much asking, can somebody give me some feedback? > The andmap implementation is naive but I haven't found a way to break a > map of threads apart from using exceptions. If anybody can suggest a > more elegant and format version, I'm all ears. > > Dex > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
