On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:44 PM David Storrs <david.sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If, on the other hand, the dev team is going to specify that TOTS will be > the Pythonic version and the Lispy version will be relegated to historical > status, with no promise that there won't be breaking changes in the > future...well, then I think Greg is right in his other-thread email that a > lot of people will bail and go seek other versions of Lisp that are going > to remain more stable. > > It's been pointed out to me that Matthew has stated quite clearly that yes, #lang racket will continue to be supported for the indefinite future. I'm sorry; I knew that but wasn't thinking about it when I wrote the above. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAE8gKoeLoeBn6P%3DWDNqCX1Yzq1SbzBn3cwjWS0WDncD7hvqL9g%40mail.gmail.com.
