Try ->i. I wouldn't worry about performance until makes itself a problem.
On 11/29/19, Ryan Kramer <default.kra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, but I don't think `case->` works for me. It looks like it chooses a > > case purely based on the number of arguments. The following example, when > given two arguments, will always choose the integer? case even if both > arguments are strings. > > (case-> [-> integer? integer? list?] > [-> string? string? list?]) > > On Friday, November 29, 2019 at 1:51:52 PM UTC-6, David Storrs wrote: >> >> I think you want `case->`: >> https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/function-contracts.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fcontract%2Fbase..rkt%29._case-~3e%29%29 >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/73132ad9-7722-432a-8328-0d4c38bbb5a1%40googlegroups.com. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFUu9R6dBHvCF8B1WsS43Xr7vL9CHiHRpMzN8NsRuCo8S6Q3%3DA%40mail.gmail.com.
