On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 11:03 AM Dominik Pantůček <dominik.pantu...@trustica.cz> wrote: > > Hello Racketeers, > > I am continuing my work on cleaning up our private source code and > publishing it as a part of my futures-sort[1] package. Current state of > the package is: > > - configurable parallelism depth > - in-place parallel merge-sort of both vector and fxvector > - parallel merge-sort with results going to a freshly allocated vector > - support for calling a custom progress reporting function for all variants
Sounds awesome! > Also I am curious about what is necessary to get the package to a higher > ring. There will be no backwards-incompatible changes from now. I don't know why your package is in ring 2, but then again I can't tell why any particular package has Ring 1 or Ring 2. Maybe Jay can answer? Either way, I wouldn't worry about it -- rings are basically an obsolete part of the pkg system. Sam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BZ9u4EAQcgc08ZC%2BcZLt%2B_VQ8Cg9G2R3CFdedU0WaF-MQ%40mail.gmail.com.
