Hi, I have encountered a counterintuitive behavior of namespace-require and
wonder if it is a bug.
Basically, namespace-require behaves differently when the target namespace
is passed by parameterizing current-namespace, compared to when the
optional namespace parameter is used.
For example, this works:
(define ns (make-base-empty-namespace))
(parameterize ([current-namespace ns]) (namespace-require 'racket))
But this gives an error about unknown module:
(define ns (make-base-empty-namespace))
(namespace-require 'racket ns)
require: unknown module
module name: #<resolved-module-path:"/Applications/Racket
v7.3/collects/racket/main.rkt">
Am I doing something wrong in the second case?
Thanks,
Yongming
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/45e0ee10-0ce0-42a9-997f-ad102e098ea4%40googlegroups.com.
