Hi, I have encountered a counterintuitive behavior of namespace-require and
wonder if it is a bug.
Basically, namespace-require behaves differently when the target namespace
is passed by parameterizing current-namespace, compared to when the
optional namespace parameter is used.
For example, this works:
(define ns (make-base-empty-namespace))
(parameterize ([current-namespace ns]) (namespace-require 'racket))
But this gives an error about unknown module:
(define ns (make-base-empty-namespace))
(namespace-require 'racket ns)
require: unknown module
module name: #<resolved-module-path:"/Applications/Racket
v7.3/collects/racket/main.rkt">
Am I doing something wrong in the second case?
Thanks,
Yongming
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/45e0ee10-0ce0-42a9-997f-ad102e098ea4%40googlegroups.com.
