That sounds like a great idea, though it's not our current aim. We do hope 
to eventually build a benchmark suite for the community, and that may 
enable improvement of profiling tools down the line.


On Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 7:01:43 AM UTC-6, evdubs wrote:
> Is this perhaps something that will help improve the available profiling 
> tools? Something like VisualVM <> would be 
> amazing for Racket!
> On Friday, February 28, 2020 at 8:31:18 AM UTC-10, Lukas Lazarek wrote:
>> PLT @ Northwestern is seeking out programs to help us understand the 
>> performance of Racket "in the wild".
>> If you have any Racket applications that you use and care about how it 
>> performs, please let us know about them in the following survey:  
>> Thank you!
>> PLT @ Northwestern

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To view this discussion on the web visit

Reply via email to