Not yet. To be more concrete:
% racket --lib racket -t ex-1.2-3.rkt -t ex-1.7.rkt -t ex-1.8.rkt -r check.rkt check.rkt:31:7: sum-of-squares-max3: unbound identifier in: sum-of-squares-max3 location...: check.rkt:31:7 context...: do-raise-syntax-error for-loop [repeats 1 more time] finish-bodys lambda-clause-expander for-loop loop [repeats 6 more times] module-begin-k expand-module16 expand-capturing-lifts temp118_0 temp91_0 compile15 temp85_0 loop The ex* files are the answers of one particular student. The check.rkt contains the tests. I am still trying to avoid the necessity of adding the (require …) commands in the check.rkt so I can select the student files to test in the command line. The -r or -f option cause the same error. The (provide …) forms are presented in the ex* files. Best, Alexandre > On 19 Mar 2020, at 20:26, Ben Greenman <benjaminlgreen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But I was really expecting that the option -t in the racket command should >> replace the explicit (require…) in B.rkt. Something like >> >>> racket -t A.rkt -f B.rkt >> default-load-handler: expected a `module' declaration, but found something >> else > > Yes that almost works, but A.rkt needs to provide things for the > require to get them. > > Also, I guess we need --lib racket (maybe my -I racket was a mistake): > > racket --lib racket -t A.rkt -f B.rkt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/418DF21E-53DA-4E66-B33C-416962E5D527%40gmail.com.
