I think you are running into the (very confusing!) issue Ben describes here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/UD20HadJ9Ec/mDd4x8Y1BwAJ
-Philip On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:00 PM Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > extract from code: > > (fprintf anomaly "resEEEulttyope was ~s~n" resulttype) > (fprintf anomaly "set resulttyoe to ~s~n" ty) > ` (set! resulttype ty) > (fprintf anomaly "resEEulttyope now ~s~n" resulttype) > > Previous creation of resulttype: > > (define resulttype : (Option TType) #f) ; TODO: check there's only one > > Output that appeared on the anomaly file: > > resEEEulttyope was #f > set resulttyoe to _void > resEEulttyope now #f > > I stuck the E's in just to make sure these were the statements really > generating that output. > > If I am correct, the set! should have changed the value of resulttype. > I'm doing thie in typed-racket. > > -- hendrik > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200423210026.3iuntiq3jqyjtpmc%40topoi.pooq.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAH3z3gbZqM4i1V_Cowzd8ewfpVZS9po5oUqXnw81BARMaJfnUg%40mail.gmail.com.
