At Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:24:37 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > - on Racket BC, operations like `+` do indeed block
... which mixing, say, fixnum and flonum arguments, but not when operating on all fixnums or all flonums. In this case, it may be the `in-range` with flonum bounds that results in `+` with fixnum 1 and a flonum. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200617083640.285%40sirmail.smtp.cs.utah.edu.
