Just in case (not sure how relevant this is to you): https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Sandboxed_Evaluation.html?q=with-limits#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fsandbox..rkt%29._with-limits%29%29 Works pretty well, but there are some caveats: if an object can be reached outside of the `with-limits` scope, it's not counted.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:42 PM George Neuner <gneun...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On 7/23/2020 8:30 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > “If you could have a wish granted, what would you like to see next in > > Racket?” > > > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/Racket/comments/hwe49b/if_you_could_have_a_wish_granted_what_would_you/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf > > or [original > > twitter](https://twitter.com/racketlang/status/1286020900660404232?s=20) > > > > SIMD ops. !!! > > Limits on resources used by individual VMs. ulimit works only at the > process level (so only indirectly affects in-process "thread" places), > and Windows has no simple equivalent: I am aware of Windows "job > objects", but there are no user controls for them. > > > George > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/8b3d3265-616d-e93e-4cd3-01b3ca91a474%40comcast.net > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CABNTSaELD1rHr3_dBw61KkLYzo5x%2B68WOywAG7AMDGC7ffrLGg%40mail.gmail.com.
