On 8/1/2020 3:48 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Note that Matthew's point was not about bytecode, but about the
machine code in the Racket BC executable vs the machine code in the
Chez kernel plus boot files. Especially if you look pre-7.0, there is
very little bytecode in the Racket BC executable.
Sam
Got it. I missed the context when I read Matthew's message.
However, my comment about average code size remains: If the Chez code
uses explicit length prefixes on all instructions that allow them (so as
to be unambiguous about intent) ... and the GCC code for the BC version
does not ... then the Chez code EASILY could be much larger.
George
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/f6c28acb-83db-7c11-8dc0-011429ec6efe%40comcast.net.
