Awesome, thanks!

Nate


On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:44 AM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Almost certainly the problem is expansion time. If I run that program
> on my machine, it takes about 200 ms. But if I compile the file to zo
> first with `raco make`, then it takes about 40 ms, basically identical
> to `racket/base`.
>
> Sam
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 9:39 AM Nate Griswold <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Oops, i am having some issues with not getting to the list from my other
> email address. Here is a reply i sent for the record.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Thank you, Matthew.
> >
> > The following code takes around 250ms on my machine. Any idea why? I was
> expecting it to be fast since the module is based on racket/base.
> >
> > #lang racket/base
> >
> > (require syntax/location)
> > (require racket/place)
> >
> >
> >
> > (module test racket/base
> >  (provide place-main)
> > racket
> >  (define (place-main pch)
> >   (void)))
> >
> > (time (place-wait (dynamic-place (quote-module-path test) 'place-main)))
> >
> > Nate
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:35 AM Nathaniel W Griswold
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you, Matthew.
> >>
> >> The following code takes around 250ms on my machine. Any idea why? I
> was expecting it to be fast since the module is based on racket/base.
> >>
> >> #lang racket/base
> >>
> >> (require syntax/location)
> >> (require racket/place)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> (module test racket/base
> >>  (provide place-main)
> >> racket
> >>  (define (place-main pch)
> >>   (void)))
> >>
> >> (time (place-wait (dynamic-place (quote-module-path test) 'place-main)))
> >>
> >> Nate
> >>
> >> On Nov 24, 2020, at 8:16 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> The bottleneck for place startup is loading modules into the new place,
> >> including modules like `racket/base`.
> >>
> >> For example,
> >>
> >>  (place-wait (dynamic-place 'racket 'void))
> >>
> >> takes around 200ms on my machine, while
> >>
> >>  (place-wait (dynamic-place 'racket/base 'void))
> >>
> >> takes around 30ms and
> >>
> >>  (place-wait (dynamic-place 'racket/kernel 'void))
> >>
> >> takes around 10ms.
> >>
> >> It sounds like you're already aware that the complexity of the module
> >> loaded into a place matters, though. Beyond using a minimal set of
> >> modules, I don't have any way to make place startup faster.
> >>
> >> Matthew
> >>
> >> At Tue, 24 Nov 2020 05:04:19 -0600, Nate Griswold wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there any way to make places startup faster? Even if i do an explicit
> >> round trip using place-channel-put and place-channel-get on both sides,
> it
> >> takes on the order of centiseconds for near empty places to start up.
> >>
> >> My program requires the threads for a couple places to be set up before
> it
> >> can operate, so this impacts my startup time by quite a bit.
> >>
> >> I have one place that has a very simple module and one place with a more
> >> complicated module. Is there some sequence that i should do things in
> for
> >> the minimal startup time? It seems nothing i do really helps much.
> >>
> >> Nate
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Racket Users" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> >> email to [email protected].
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPpvfCHHDDpfNmuTWQOyfYfEJ7v
> >> m1c_dS7nj3FxaEFVm2Q%40mail.gmail.com.
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Racket Users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPqtJrem4j%3DUi3fbrduoahsXCNNA2JPuB0Tt9dissiu5KA%40mail.gmail.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPqVgEBvrRzjU7%3DX_h3Wy_YUH11G6CX5%2BKjSct26pi3oEA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to