Round 20 was recently published and Racket's score improved, as expected:

We're now beating many of the popular frameworks in the composite scores
and I think there are still plenty of improvements that could be made.

hashim muqtadir writes:

> A new version of these benchmarks was just published ("Round 19"):
> Racket scores rather poorly (0 errors is nice, though). Anybody has any
> guesses as to why this is? Racket performs well enough as far as I'm
> concerned, and while I don't use the web server much, sounds unlikely that
> it should be so far below django, for example. Maybe they run it in a
> handicapped configuration or something.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To view this discussion on the web visit

Reply via email to