On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:24 PM Dimaugh Silvestris <dimaughsilvest...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 19:29, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: >> >> It doesn't print that way because that wouldn't turn back into the original >> value when evaluated, since it's quoted. > > > Is there any other way? > If not, I might consider the possibility of having a struct type for each of > those ugens, but as I was saying in my first mail - is that sensible? That > would mean declaring ~600 struct types.
I'm not totally sure what you want. The goal of `print` is to print things in roughly a way that evaluating the printed result would produce the original value. Thus: Evaluating '(1 2 3) produces a 3-element list. Evaluating (sinosc: 1 2) sounds like it produces a structure that you want. But evaluating '(sinosc: 1 2) produces a 3-element list, not a structure. Thus, you don't want that as the printed result. That means that if you want to construct a pair of 0 and that structure, you need to use `cons` and not `quote`. If you want something else then you might need to construct the function provided for `gen:custom-write` directly, instead of using `make-constructor-style-printer`, but I still don't understand what you want the result to be. Sam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BZfBAj7sTP83Ke965r8jXFKiPKNz5jfqv38NiergNHs5w%40mail.gmail.com.
