I am not sure about the technical details, but would it be possible to rename those identifiers with?: (require (rename-in fluent [→ ~>] [→→ ~~>])) I think if you define those arrows as syntax parameters they could be renamed, but I don't know whether that is the "right" way to do it in racket. https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stxparam.html?q=syntax-parameter
I like the ~> and ~~> arrows they are quite distinct, seems like a good default to me. I think the rackety way would be to have one default name and make them rename-able. Then fluent/unicode would not be necessary, but I also would not be bothered by it. On a technical level I would prefer a solution that does not result in more and more code generation for every renamed variant. Roger Keays schrieb am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021 um 19:44:28 UTC+1: > > > > It might be nice to use ~> and ~>> (or |> and |>> or choose your > own) as infix > > > > to avoid clashing with >. > > I'm thinking about changing the default operators to ~> and ~~> and making > the unicode versions available using (require fluent/unicode). I actually > prefer the long arrow for thread-last to the current syntax (>>). > > Any thoughts? > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:31:08PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:23:46PM +0700, Roger Keays wrote: > > > > I've been using the Clojure-like threading package for a while now > and this has > > > > some nice advantages that are mentioned in the docs, like blending > the first > > > > arg > and last arg >> variants easily in a sequence. > > > > > > > > How does fluent manage this infixing from a (require ...) rather > than a #lang? > > > > > > It provides a custom #%app macro which rearranges the code into > regular s-expressions. I was surprised by how much flexibility this feature > of racket gives you. It would have taken months to build this from scratch > in any other language. The racket version is 25 lines of code. [1] > > > > > > > It might be nice to use ~> and ~>> (or |> and |>> or choose your > own) as infix > > > > to avoid clashing with >. > > > > > > I wanted a single character because I use it so often. I suppose with > the unicode (→) option, there is less need for a single-character solution. > Need to think about this... > > > > Only if your keyboard has a convenient single key to type it with. > > > > -- hendrik > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/rogerkeays/racket-fluent/blob/main/main.rkt > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > > "Racket Users" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email > > > > to [email protected]. > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ > > > > racket-users/ > > > > CAFKxZVVBV1sP%2BKk%2B%2Bdw7k7a_TcEsL-yz6%2BLKDLZOa2Wfc1RAYw% > 40mail.gmail.com. > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Racket Users" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/sigid.0703ba7d55.20210310132341.GA3081%40papaya.papaya > . > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Racket Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20210311003108.qjqsrn4kd6nbwtd5%40topoi.pooq.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/79e3eb5f-90cb-49fb-824b-92e5b184053en%40googlegroups.com.
