Yep, I think that’s probably on the money. I guess this is really a classic 
example of the problem with writing code using internet search.

Many thanks!

> On May 7, 2021, at 4:38 PM, Ben Greenman <benjaminlgreen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 5/7/21, Shu-Hung You <shh...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>> Not that I have any idea of what's going on, but interestingly, Typed
>> Racket's second ->* example has (1)(3)(4). The use of list* may be
>> possible if one follows the type (List* String Natural x) in the
>> example.
>> 
>> https://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/type-ref.html?#%28form._%28%28lib._typed-racket%2Fbase-env%2Fbase-types-extra..rkt%29._-~3e%2A%29%29
>> 
>> Shu-Hung
> 
> +1, that example in the docs looks _very_ similar to the student code
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFUu9R4SJ7OisUeH5mFxGHpycrxhKYNFuSMLLgSzKCprt2aQWQ%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/36e88c8e-d2eb-43b5-8a8d-4144487fe347%40mtasv.net.

Reply via email to