On 1 September 2011 13:13, pancake <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/29/11 22:31, Robin Vossen wrote:
>>
>> Wel Radare uses a lot of macros and that makes it hard to read. And
>> ofcourse the Custom Types like RList etc.
>
> I would not say a lot of macros.. did you ever saw OpenSSL source code?
> the cpp macros used in r2
>
>
> all custom types are required to keep coherence, avoid dependencies, be
> portable and have support for valabind (python bindings for example needs
> this)
>
Ofcourse more than obvious but still I'd require to read all that code =P

> those RList, RHash.. implementations are quite straight forward.. so i dont
> think
> they are hard to understand. but feel free to ask any question.

Bet they are easy =)

>>
>> I'll just need to get that "tick" of Radare development I guess.
>> The UPX thing is nearly done but I am sure it won't work yet. (If that
>> makes sense).
>
> dont get it..

I'll post the progress of UPX if I can get it compiled. (If that even happens)
but it's fairy 'guessed' till now. But it is implemented.  With a lot
of 'guess' work.
heheh

>>
>> And Yes I wanted to donate since I made money since of Radare.
>> Either bank transfer or paypal would be alright.
>> Or you could come and pick it up.
>>
> ok, will think on that and i'll give you the info.
>
Great =)

> thanks
> _______________________________________________
> radare mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org
>



-- 
Kind Regards,
Robin Vossen

Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
_______________________________________________
radare mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org

Reply via email to