You couldn't cmake me touch that one with a 10-foot python. > From: Georg Mischler <[email protected]> > Subject: [Radiance-dev] Test suite design > Date: March 16, 2016 2:02:11 PM PDT > > Forking this into a new thread. > > Am 2016-03-16 17:00, schrieb Rob Guglielmetti: >> Same for testing; any tests for scons should probably be "ported" to >> CMake and vice versa, assuming each testing framework has the the >> other's ability... > > That sounds like a lot of duplicate work... > > Wouldn't it make more sense to maintain just one test suite, and > have either build system just invoke that? > > This could be either the current Python suite (probably after > some refactoring), the current CMake suite, or something entirely > different. > > So now we need opinions and arguments that would make one or the > other solution preferrable. Any takers? > > -schorsch > > -- > Georg Mischler -- simulations developer -- schorsch at schorsch com > +schorsch.com+ -- lighting design tools -- http://www.schorsch.com/
_______________________________________________ Radiance-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev
