Sean, Yeah since I wrote that message I'd done some looking around:
http://www.wilsonweb.com/wmt5/html-email-multi.htm http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/1521/18.htm And will look into it more this afternooon. I need to follow through the code and my page to see why my the plain text version is blank, as on first glance in the code it looks like it'd have a default list of the fields at least. Then I'll look into why Mac Mail isn't choosing the HTML version as it did in a multipart/mixed message... If I see any reason to change things in the code I'll write-back with my suggestion. Right now as far as I can see the raw multipart/ alternative message looks correct except the missing plain/text content. Thanks, Loren On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote: > Loren, > > That was my change. Back last March when I was developing a Rails > application that needed to send email, I dissected various > gracefully-degrading emails that I got in my inbox. I found that, for > most email clients, the multipart/alternative type with a text/ > plain and > a text/html part seemed to be the most compatible. I'm willing to > change that assumption, however, and the code, if you have a better > solution. I searched a lot and didn't find any reliable reference for > how they should be formatted, so I reverse-engineered it. > > Sean > _______________________________________________ > Radiant mailing list > Post: [email protected] > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
