> Well all, I'm back ;) > > Anyways, just a quick question. I remember discussion about caching > still being hashed out for 0.6.0. My question is, is that I > want to move > to 0.6.0, but my concern is caching. I have a LOT of traffic now and > don't think my host would be thrilled with pegging the CPU and I hope > there is caching in place.
Caching in 0.6.0 is pretty much the same mechanism as caching in 0.5.2 - though there has been some performance improvements, if you're currently running 0.5.2, you should see a drop in cpu usage. The figures in this email: http://lists.radiantcms.org/pipermail/radiant-core/2007-January/000244.h tml Show the performance of the new caching mechanism - that's running on an AMD Athlon 1700 with 512mb RAM running apache2 with 2 fastcgid processes (but the machine was also running a bunch of other processes, so the figures may be slightly low). If your host supports xsendfile (typically only if you're using a VPS/dedicated server and you've installed it yourself or they run lighttpd), you can have performance only 4-8x slower than raw apache - that's quite good performance. Dan. _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
