Sean Cribbs schrieb: > Your mongrels should not be taking that much memory. Are you running > them in production mode? Also consider that unless your sites are > really heavily and frequently viewed, you may need only one mongrel per > site. > > Sean
Hi Sean, Thanks for your answer. Hmmm. Yes, the mongrels are running in production mode. Approximately how much memory should each be needing then? ps aux shows: root 7896 0.0 3.7 82192 38148 ? Sl 14:24 0:01 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8002 -a 127.0.0.1 -P root 7899 0.0 3.7 82192 38140 ? Sl 14:24 0:01 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8003 -a 127.0.0.1 -P root 7903 0.0 4.6 90352 48156 ? Sl 14:24 0:01 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8000 -a 127.0.0.1 -P root 7906 0.0 4.6 90360 48160 ? Sl 14:24 0:01 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8001 -a 127.0.0.1 -P root 7912 0.0 3.7 82184 38140 ? Sl 14:24 0:01 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8004 -a 127.0.0.1 -P root 7915 0.0 3.7 82192 38152 ? Sl 14:24 0:01 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -e production -p 8005 -a 127.0.0.1 -P I have restarted mongrel just now and the consumption is much less (between 3.7% and 4.6% each at 1GB RAM). Yesterday (after running a few days all of the mongrel processes were over 5%). Not to wander off into a mongrel discussion, although I would be very interested in your answer, is this then (1 mongrel per database) the recommended way to do it at this point? It's ok, but I wanted to check if there was, maybe a better way... best regards, Nancy _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
