Hi Dan: Daniel Sheppard wrote: > In terms of interface, however I think creating dedicated interfaces > for asset and comment management is a better way to go.
My plan for that is to provide content class filters for the tree, such that only objects of the specific class are displayed. This idea can also be extended to provide stored tree views that can be accessed. For example a view that only shows comments or assets. Another potential extension is to provide the option to limit the display to a specific subtree, e.g. "Show me all comments that are below this page." > I do like the way that you've put the 'add...' combo box on the page > tree - we definitely need something that lets you specify the page > type before you start editing it so that you can get the interface > appropriate for your specific page type rather than just the generic > page editing interface. Not sure if yours is the way to go, but I > like the fact that it's a one-click solution. I find it looks quite crowded as it is right now, though I currently can't think of an alternative. Maybe some fancy Javascript with hovering pop-ups or so will do. Thanks for the feedback. Cheers, Oliver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
