Sean Cribbs wrote:
> No name collision, just not good practice.  Although "type" can invoke 
> the class of the current object, it doesn't necessarily have to.  Still, 
> I would shy away from it.  Here's some more suggestions:
> 
> field
> column
> pick
> use

How about "for"?

--
John Long
http://wiseheartdesign.com
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   [email protected]
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to