Adam Salter wrote: > Can someone please explain to me if there is any reason not to freeze > your install to a particular version of rails? > It's a matter of personal choice and disk space only. I assume you meant to freeze Radiant because it includes Rails in its package. > Does rails run faster if it's run from gem? or local vendor directory? > They're both directories, so the speed is the same, essentially. > I also notice it has it's own rails install... Wouldn't it be better > to just run from the latest rails gem on hand? or make the gem > dependant on rails gem vx.x.x? > No. We tossed this one around and decided that to reduce incompatibilities and issues with people lacking root access, etc, we would package Rails along with Radiant. It saves a lot of headaches, even though the gem size is larger. > If it's faster to use locally installed gems how do I force Radiant > not to use it's bundled version of Rails? > See above. However, if a newer bug-fix release of Rails comes out (i.e. 1.2.4, 1.2.5, etc) the trunk version will probably be updated to it soon after.
Sean _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
