On May 20, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Mario T. Lanza wrote: > Yes, Radiant is a CMS for static sites and that's what I'm using it > for. > However, if any one thing met my every need that'd be fortuitous. In > the end, Radiant meets 90% of my need. Yet, there remains that 10% > unmet need that I simply cannot abandon. So do I chuck Radiant simply > because it only gets me 90% of the way? I don't think so. I just > start > brainstorming for ways to squeeze out the 10%, if not from Radiant, > then > from Rails.
Mario, all of this was well said. I particularly empathize with the above. aiwilliams _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
