Personally, I agree with Martin Fowler on this matter. See http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/MovingAwayFromXslt.html
Unless speed is critical I will simplicity whenever possible. On 7/5/07, Keymone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > just curious: isn't XSLT faster than any radiant template parser? > XSLT is bad only in one thing - when it goes to dynamic data, > you can't change input XML on fly but XSLT parser is really good idea > for template language. > > -- > Regards, Keymone > _______________________________________________ > Radiant mailing list > Post: [email protected] > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
