On Sep 21, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Glenn Gillen wrote: > From my understanding (I've yet to verify, but it's a project for a > client this weekend anyway) Mongrel is reputably not that great at > serving static content anyway, so the biggest performance gain would > be a caching model that provided a path to a static HTML output (akin > to rails) so that Apache/Nginx/Whatever is fronting mongrel can serve > the files directly and bypass anything ruby related.
Use a mod-rewrite rule to not pass the page request if the file or directory already exists, should work well. -- Damien McKenna - Husband, father, geek. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mc-kenna.com/ _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
