Oh oh, along the same "priorites" line - what about RadDAV? RADiant DAV instead of WebDAV. :)
Also, I'm not sure but would you edit your stuff in Production or would you just edit it in Development and then migrate it? I'm a Rails/Radiant newb so I envision building things out in a development environment and then migrating them to QA -> Production. Is that the way things operate in your world? I have a corporate enterprise mentality (just having recently escaped) and it's not quite clear how we move code around in Radiant. Later... Richard On 10/2/07, Andrew O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a warning: I'm probably not going to be able to get any real work > done for a couple of days. Sounds like a couple of people are > interested in this though, so I figure I'll lay out what I've come up > with so far just doing preliminary investigation: > > 1) I think WebDAV is the way to go, for reasons outlined above. I > love the idea of FUSE, but I have reservations. > > 2) The WebDAV server should run as a separate process so that neither > it nor Radiant will block the other one. > > 3) I'm not sure how much caching can be done in this situation (or how > hard it will be to control expiry), so I'd like to be as > multi-threaded as possible. Also, since this isn't going to use > Javascript or any view functionality, I think I'd rather use a more > minimal framework than Rails. I'm thinking Merb (with Radiant's > models). > > I'd considered Camping, but Camping is for fun stuff -- not serious > work! (Just kidding -- it's really because it can be a little hard to > follow unless you have a PhD in metaprogrammology). > > Ok, that's what I've come up with for now. Oh, and a cool name (see > I've got my priorities in line): Daviant. I just printed out RFC > 4918, so I'm sure I'll have a better idea after I read that. > > http://www.webdav.org/specs/rfc4918.pdf > > Any feedback would be most appreciated. > > -Andrew > > On 10/2/07, Oli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Andrew, I'd be really interested in seeing what you come up with for > > either WebDAV or FUSE. This would totally solve two of my main pain > > points with Radiant - editing templates in Textmate not the browser, > > and moving changes from staging on localhost to the live server. If > > it plays nicely with svn or another versioning program that would be > > icing on the cake! > > > > Please keep us informed :-D > > > > peace - oli > > _______________________________________________ > > Radiant mailing list > > Post: [email protected] > > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > > Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > > > _______________________________________________ > Radiant mailing list > Post: [email protected] > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
