Oh I see what you mean.  I fully intend for authors to be able to
register and have short blurbs about themselves and manage all of
their extensions.  Both authors and extensions will be browseable.
You can see the code for the prototype at
http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/browser/trunk/accents

Sean

On 10/12/07, Mitch Pirtle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2007, at 17:31 , Sean Cribbs wrote:
>
> > In what sense?  WWR is primarily a directory of people, groups,
> > projects, and companies.  Its focus is entirely different.  Is there
> > something I'm not picking up on?
> >
> > Please don't take these questions as confrontational, I just don't
> > understand how WWR is related to the problem that an extension
> > repository would solve.
>
>
> Sure, maybe I'm missing the intent then. Won't be the first, or last
> time ;-)
>
> So are you looking for something more like http://
> extensions.joomla.org where you get nothing but info about extensions?
>
> The reason I mentioned workingwithrails is that it seemed like a good
> start of an extension site that had a social component baked in -
> something that I feel the joomla extensions site lacks. An extension
> site that makes it easy to see what a particular developer produces,
> or see who is using what, is IMHO a really neat resource.
>
> -- Mitch
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   [email protected]
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   [email protected]
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to