Andrew mentioned HostingRails (http://www.hostingrails.com/)... does  
anyone else have any experience with them?

> If you don't want to manage your own hosting (As your email seems to
> point out) there are solutions, depending on the $ you're looking to
> spend. There are plenty of services, but the one that pops into my  
> head
> is http://www.hostingrails.com/ - They offer cheaper fcgi (Which I
> likely wouldn't touch again due to the dynamic allocation issues I had
> on DreamHost), or starting at $9.79, you can go Mongrel or $13.98  
> and up
> for Mongrel Cluster.



On Nov 8, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Travis Bell wrote:

> I agree with a big thumbs up for LiteSpeed. We run LiteSpeed on our
> production and dev environments primarily for it's ease of use with
> Rails. On top of that, it's fast to boot and always "just works".
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Travis Bell
> Not sent from my iPhone.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8-Nov-07, at 7:22 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
>
>> If you don't want to fiddle with Mongrel or FCGI on your VPS, I  
>> highly
>> recommend Litespeed Web Server.  The free version runs quite nicely
>> and
>> their LSAPI is significantly faster than FCGI.  The big bonus is  
>> being
>> able to configure your Rails apps from a web interface.  When we
>> launched kckcc.edu in January, we used Litespeed (purchased 2-cpu
>> version) and were quite happy with it.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> Andrew Klein wrote:
>>> Hello Ryan!
>>>
>>> Welcome to Radiant on Dreamhost! To sum it up, Dreamhost's support
>>> for
>>> Rails in general SUCKS. They run on a dynamic-count fcgi setup and
>>> they
>>> will not do anything to help you. After 2 months of back and forth
>>> with
>>> their support, they will not do ANYTHING to their default box setup.
>>> 'It's set up for a reason' attitude. Problem with Dreamhost is by
>>> default they put a cap on you for 200MB RAM usage, and as soon as  
>>> you
>>> get --5-- processes running of Radiant or any slightly-heavier Rails
>>> script up, you will git that point and their process killer will
>>> ruthlessly start killing your processes; As well, I found if I got
>>> too
>>> fast of traffic with them, my CPU would spike HARD (From the dynamic
>>> fcgi launching) and it too then would kill the processes. For many
>>> sites, a fixed 2-process fcgi setup would do well, it cuts down on
>>> memory usage overall and you get some serious speed increases  
>>> because
>>> you're not relaunching a process over and over (As soon as one of
>>> the 5
>>> processes die down, it kills them too, with how DreamHost is set
>>> up) - I
>>> couldn't handle 500-600 visitors with DreamHost at all.
>>> Impossible. My
>>> site would be down for 40-50 minutes out of every hour, just
>>> because of
>>> apache taking a moment to respawn a ruthlessly-killed fcgi thread
>>> (s). I
>>> couldn't imagine trying to manage them with the 1500-2200 visitors
>>> I get
>>> daily now.
>>>
>>> Myself? I chose to host my own system. Rather than a dedicated  
>>> box, I
>>> went for a VPS, which has been actually very rewarding, but let me
>>> tell
>>> you, getting a Mongrel cluster set up and optimized is a headache  
>>> you
>>> may NOT want to partake in.
>>>
>>> If you don't want to manage your own hosting (As your email seems to
>>> point out) there are solutions, depending on the $ you're looking to
>>> spend. There are plenty of services, but the one that pops into my
>>> head
>>> is http://www.hostingrails.com/ - They offer cheaper fcgi (Which I
>>> likely wouldn't touch again due to the dynamic allocation issues I
>>> had
>>> on DreamHost), or starting at $9.79, you can go Mongrel or $13.98
>>> and up
>>> for Mongrel Cluster.
>>>
>>> Just because it says 'Rails' on their features page, does NOT mean
>>> they
>>> have any clue how to run a Rails service. It's like saying 'Free
>>> diamond
>>> ring with any purchase!' and then giving you a plastic ring with a
>>> diamond chip taped to it.
>>>
>>> Anyways, hope this helps.
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> Ryan Heneise wrote:
>>>
>>>> What are your best experiences with web hosts for Radiant? Are  
>>>> there
>>>> any hosts that are particularly Radiant-friendly? Where do you host
>>>> your Radiant sites now? Are you happy with them?
>>>>
>>>> I'll start...
>>>>
>>>> I've been hosting several Radiant sites on Dreamhost, but I've been
>>>> only marginally happy with the service. It tends to be pretty
>>>> slow at
>>>> times.
>>>>
>>>> I've had the best luck with my own server, which is a colocated
>>>> Apple
>>>> Xserve. I have full control over it, but it is a pain to manage,
>>>> and I
>>>> don't like being stuck with the full liability of hosting  
>>>> customers'
>>>> sites _and_ email and all that goes with it. On the other hand,
>>>> Xserve
>>>> is an awesome environment for Rails/Radiant. And I'm really looking
>>>> forward to trying Leopard server - it really seems ideal for this
>>>> sort
>>>> of thing.
>>>>
>>>> - Ryan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Radiant mailing list
>>>> Post:   [email protected]
>>>> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
>>>> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Radiant mailing list
>>> Post:   [email protected]
>>> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
>>> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Radiant mailing list
>> Post:   [email protected]
>> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
>> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   [email protected]
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>

_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   [email protected]
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to