Theoretically, one could modify the ResponseCache class to use memcached. I wonder what the performance increases would be like.
However, you are right in suspecting that the directory change is the problem... the default environment.rb sets the ActionController cache directory to RAILS_ROOT/cache IIRC. Sean Andrew O'Brien wrote: > Hi Mario, > > Sorry to hear about your problems -- that sounds like it could have > seriously sucked without source control! > > I was wondering though: what kind of safe-guards you'd want to > incorporate in the caching mechanism? I agree that clearing a > directory is dangerous, but IIRC, default Rails caching does something > similar (maybe with options for more fine-grained control). > > Out of curiosity, why did you change the cache directory if you had > turned off caching? (That was the problem here, right? That Rails > page caching goes to the public dir?) > > -Andrew > > On Jan 5, 2008 11:03 AM, Mario T. Lanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I apologize for coming across a little harsh. No disrespect intended to >> anyone. :) >> >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> _______________________________________________ >> Radiant mailing list >> Post: [email protected] >> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ >> Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Radiant mailing list > Post: [email protected] > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > > _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
