[snip]

>  I'm not sure how a pull request would be any more effective than a patch on
>  Trac, especially given that Trac is highly visible and accessable by all
>  core members, not just a single person.  The best bet would probably be to
>  just do what was suggested and give more people commit access.  We can just
>  watch the timeline in Trac to see whats going in, and if regressions are a
>  concern, we should be able to set up CruiseControl.rb to watch for test
>  failures.

[/snip]

Git is superior to SVN in the same way that SVN is superior to CVS.
So moving to git in general is probably in the best interests of the
project.

One key way in which git is superior to SVN is the ease with which you
can contribute complex patches (such as new features or a major
refactoring) and have everyone be able to easily try them out with a
simple clone operation on the forked repository.

Github specifically allows you watch projects via RSS feeds so that's
a nice bonus as well.  No need to have a special email list for
commits.

>  -todd[1]

sean schofield
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   [email protected]
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to