It can't - it's a calculation based on each record. I just don't want to clobber people's data.

I'm looking into an alternate approach right now so I may get around the need altogether. Still, it seems like something AR would allow during a migrate...

-Chris

Sean Cribbs wrote:
If it's something that can be updated wholesale (i.e. the same for every record, or derived on the same attributes), you can use MyClass.update_all, which will not cause them to be loaded with ActiveRecord.

Sean

Chris Parrish wrote:
What's the secret to creating a migration for my extension that changes
the data yet doesn't trigger the UserActionObserver?

I already figured out that I need to set MyClass.record_timestamps =
false so that I don't artificially change the updated_at field, but
changing a value and saving that record still causes the updated_by
field to loose the user_id since migrations don't have any user assigned.

What am I missing?

-Chris

_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant


_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to